|
|---|
| Home | USA | Europe | World | Law | Security | Elections | Week in Review | About us |
|---|
|
|||||
WILL FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN DETERMINE NEXT U.S. PRESIDENT? - March 12, 2008 DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE CANNOT BE SELECTED WITHOUT THE "SUPER-DELEGATES"
Whether it is Senator Barack Obama or Senator Hillary Clinton, the prospective Democratic Party candidate cannot win the necessary number of “pledged” or elected delegates to gain the nomination. The race will have to be settled by the so-termed “super delegates,” or the selected Party insiders that constitute 20% of the total nominating delegates. However, the super delegates are going to be reluctant to be the decisive factor until all the pledged delegates have been allocated and accredited to the Democratic Party Convention, and this includes those from Florida and Michigan. Right now the Florida and Michigan delegates are not accredited, because their state party leadership broke the rules by trying to jump to the front of the nominating primary schedule. There was a primary election, but it was not contested by agreement of the Democratic National Party and all the candidates. No one campaigned in those states, except for purportedly fund raising, and Obama was not even on the ballot in Michigan. The Democratic voters did not turn out in numbers to be expected in this Presidential cycle. Clinton’s camp has tried to advance the notion that the election results from the “original” Michigan and Florida primary election should be certified and delegates accordingly apportioned. That will not fly, at least because it would be readily challenged as to its legality: the rules cannot be changed in the middle of the process. Obama’s camp certainly cannot agree to the Clinton camp’s proposal. They are not necessarily inclined to even a new primary election. Obama is already ahead in pledged delegates and not obviously anxious to add new delegates to compete for in the primary process. Presumably also, the Florida and Michigan demographics favor Hillary Clinton. FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN DECISIVE BY REVOTE OR OMISSION
The super delegates will have to be relied upon by both Hillary and Barack to take either over the top. Simply because of the closeness of the contests and the proportional apportionment of pledged delegates, it will have to be the votes of the super delegates that will take either candidate to nomination. Neither candidate though will want to project their nomination being the result of super delegates overriding the wishes of the pledged delegates. Barack claims that his caucus and primary victories and lead in delegates give him legitimacy and the backing of voters that should not be overturned by the super delegates. Hillary claims that she has the mandate because she has been winning most of the “battle ground” or decisive states historically determining who wins Presidential elections between Republicans and Democrats. The arguments of both of the candidates hold water, but are incomplete without the inclusion of Florida and Michigan in the Democratic Party contest. Florida and Michigan are two, representative populous states that constitute almost 10% of the pledged delegates, and both are battlegrounds. Who can forget the “chad” recount battle of 2000 between Al Gore and George W. Bush.
The only issue that remains to be settled is how to hold the “revote.” It could be a whole new primary election, which is most logistically difficult and expensive, to some form of caucus or even internet vote. So far there has been no resolution. However, I suspect that it’s not so much the money, $20million for the more elaborate options per state, but the maneuvering between the two campaign teams. Each is trying to calculate the optimum option, and maybe neither team is particularly committed to the revote and including Florida and Michigan, unless it serves their strategy of gaining the Democratic nomination. HOW DEMOCRATS LOSE PRESIDENCY IN FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN Senator John McCain would need only a small number of Democratic voters to stay home in November or even lesser numbers of independents to vote for him, and the Democratic nominee, Hillary or Barack, would lose either one or both of these states, particularly Florida. In turn, this probably would be enough for the Democrats to lose the Presidency against a formidable candidate such as McCain. HOW DEMOCRATS WIN PRESIDENCY IN FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN And yes, while on first blush, the battle might be bloody and divisive, it would also give the Democratic candidates immense coverage and energize the Democratic base, independent and new voters. The Republican nominee would benefit from the potential bloodbath in the electoral arena, but he will also seem to be relegated to secondary status as this Democratic primary “re-contest” would capture overwhelming attention. What might be lost in divisiveness, the eventual Democratic Party nominee would gain in energizing the electorate. "THE PEOPLE'S CHAMP": DEMOCRATIC NOMINEE MUST WIN THE DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY VOTERS IN FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN, OR LOSE THE NOVEMBER ELECTIONS However, Obama cannot afford not to support a revote in Florida and Michigan while claiming the title of “The People’s Champ.” He cannot appear to be evasive or avoiding another round in these two states. Hillary probably needs victories in Florida and Michigan, as well as Pennsylvania to be somewhere close to equal with Obama in pledged delegates. The popular theory goes like this: if the match is close on points, the Champion retains the crown. Hillary was certainly seen as the champion while Obama was the clear challenger, at the outset of the primary elections. Regardless, like Mohammed Ali, Obama would have to claim the title in the rink, and decisively to secure his standing as The People’s Champ and victory in November. That means going into the rink in Florida and Michigan.
-------------------- Mr. Muhamed Sacirbey holds B.A. degree in history and J. D. degree from Tulane University in New Orleans. He also holds M.B.A. degree from Columbia University. Prior to becoming Bosnia’s Foreign Minister and Ambassador to the United Nations, he practiced as an attorney in New York City and worked for several years as an investment banker. He presently writes his book “A Convenient Genocide, in a fishbowl ” and is a commentator on human rights and political issues. --------------------
Related articles:
Obama and America's Original Sin - April 7, 2008 My House Divided - March 24, 2008 The Continuing Democratic Race - March 10, 2008 Super Tuesday Truth - February 8, 2008 Into the Stretch: Landscape before Feb. 5 - February 2, 2008 Turnaround! - The New Hampshire Primary Results - January 10, 2008 Out of the Gate: Obama makes history - January 5, 2008 Mike Huckabee Story: From out of Nowhere - December 27, 2007 American Health Care - December 17, 2007 At the Starting Gate - November 15, 2007 Iowa and New Hampshire - October 4, 2007 A fifty/fifty nation - September 8, 2007 Obama: a foreign policy visionary or neophyte? - August 12, 2007 Democratic contenders - July 3, 2007 Immigration debate - May 10, 2007 |
|||||
© 2006-2008 The European Courier. All rights reserved. Reproduction of the content of this website without written permission strictly prohibited. |
|---|