|
|---|
| Home | USA | Europe | World | Law | Security | Art & Diplomacy | Week in Review | About us |
|---|
|
|||||
HASTA LA VISTA, HILLARY - May 8, 2008
(to deep dissatisfaction of my lovely wife - a devout Hillary’s supporter). Those pundits, who predicted a tie in North Carolina because of the Wright-gate, proved themselves a little bit naive. Eventually, why would black voters in North Carolina, who for the first time in history were given a real opportunity to choose a black presidential nominee, decide not to vote for Obama? (Although it is inaccurate to call Obama merely a black candidate, because as a matter of fact, he is partly black, after dad, and partly white, after mom - and we don’t know yet, which DNA part is the dominating one). WRIGHT OR WRONG?
It was pretty much obvious to me that the Rev. Wright “scandal” would not hurt Obama too much. Firstly, because it was taken out of proportion and the issue was completely exhausted by the media. People must have been changing channels whenever they heard a word “wright”, “right”, or “reverend” (for example my wife was doing so, although she also has this habit of changing channels whenever she hears a word “Obama”). Secondly, because it was illogical to believe that Rev. Wright’s distorted opinions may affect people’s perception of Obama. One doesn’t go to a church to worship a reverend or a priest but because one feels a personal connection with God. If that was the issue then, for example, the Catholic Church in the U.S. would have stopped to exist some time ago. It is less evil to say something ridiculous about U.S. government’s involvement in HIV/AIDS or 9/11 (as Rev. Wright did), than for instance to sexually molest children (as the Catholic priests did in the U.S., for what the Pope recently personally apologized). So if the Catholic Church, and the Catholics themselves, weren’t destroyed by the wrongdoings of a number of priests, then why would Obama be seriously damaged by Rev. Wright’s political misjudgments?
Thirdly, this election is far from being a contest of personalities. Candidates’ characters won’t matter this year. I disagree with Dick Morris, who claims that this question about Obama will keep coming back in the following months whether his knowledge of Rev. Wright’s political beliefs was pre-existing. Fortunately or not, the most important questions, which people are going to ask themselves in this election will be: how much gas costs the next year, if they still have their jobs and if the healthcare is affordable to them. In this context, I don’t even think that McCain’s respected service to this country may be of significant advantage to him over Obama. Overall, voters usually give the most consideration to the economic agendas (“the economy, stupid!” - as Bill Clinton would say). NO EXIT STRATEGY And Hillary? Regrettably, she appears to be a candidate without an exit strategy. Apparently, what Mrs. Clinton claimed that Bush did wrong in Iraq, she is now repeating in her own presidential bid. It is pretty much the same kind of mentality. George W. Bush still believes he can win the war in Iraq, while Hillary Clinton still believes she can win the Democratic nomination. John McCain must be happy, I guess, because at least until the Democratic National Convention he won’t be the only one trying to destroy Obama’s reputation. TEFLON JOHN But McCain has enough problems of his own as well. Yesterday, some of the evangelical leaders called for the movement to pull out of the party politics. Well, if they do, then McCain is in trouble. Unfortunately, Teflon John (as some liberal media call him) does not spark deep enthusiasm of the evangelicals (who constitute approximately one fourth of the voters in the U.S.). Additionally, said appeal for withdrawal may be interpreted as a warning if not an indirect request to nominate Mike Huckabee, an evangelical preacher, as McCain’s running mate. However, Huckabee doesn’t have enough money (or fund-raising potential) to contribute to the campaign, and additionally McCain may need to consider choosing a member of some ethnical minority as his running mate in order to balance Obama’s appeal as the first color presidential candidate. In any way, McCain may need to gamble.
------------------------------- Author of the article holds Master of Laws degree in EU and Polish law from Lazarski School of Commerce and Law in Warsaw, Poland. -------------------------------
Related articles: Obama and America's Original Sin - April 7, 2008 Will Florida and Michigan Determine Next U.S. President? - March 12, 2008 The Countinuing Democratic Race - March 10, 2008 Foreman vs. Ali 2 - February 15, 2008 Super Tuesday Truth - February 8, 2008 Into the Stretch: Landscape before Feb. 5 - February 2, 2008 Turnaround! - The New Hampshire Primary Results - January 10, 2008 Out of the Gate: Obama makes history - January 5, 2008 Mike Huckabee Story: From out of Nowhere - December 27, 2007 American Health Care - December 17, 2007 At the Starting Gate - November 15, 2007 Iowa and New Hampshire - October 4, 2007 A fifty/fifty nation - September 8, 2007 Obama: a foreign policy visionary or neophyte? - August 12, 2007 Democratic contenders - July 3, 2007 Immigration debate - May 10, 2007 |
|||||
© 2006-2009 The European Courier. All rights reserved. Reproduction of the content of this website without written permission strictly prohibited. |
|---|